Araştırma Makalesi

Mu’tezile Mezhebine Ehl-i Sünnet’in İsnâdı: ‘Kırâatlar, Tevkîfî Değil; İctihâdîdir’ -Zemahşerî Özelinde Bir İddianın Değerlendirilmesi--

Imputation of Ahl Al-Sunnah to Al-Mu’tazilah: ‘Variant Readings Didn’t Base on Divine Authority; But Personal Opinion’ -Inquiring for an Imputation in Private of Al-Zamakhshari-

Öz

Some classical Ahl al-Sunnah scholars and some modern authors claim that al-Mu’tazilah, especially Zamakhshari adopt that variant readings had based on personal opinion (al-ichtihadi). They also present those claims as depending on above-mentioned basic claim: ‘Mu’tazilah and Zamakhshari hadn’t considered al-rasm al-Mushaf and had prefered al-qiraat al-shazza to al-qiraat al-mutawatira and had given precedence to Arabic language and rethoric rather than naql and had gone beyond the limit in criticism of variant readings and had used variant readings for supporting their own views. In this article, after we gave those claims, we presented Mutazilah’s qiraat views with their terminology and theoretical approaches and practical usings in private of Zamakhshari. Finally, we will try to inquire those claims as taking into above-mentioned subjects and taking into consideration their back-grounds.
Some classical Ahl al-Sunnah scholars and some modern authors claim that al-Mu’tazilah, especially Zamakhshari adopt that variant readings had based on personal opinion (al-ichtihadi). They also present those claims as depending on above-mentioned basic claim: ‘Mu’tazilah and Zamakhshari hadn’t considered al-rasm al-Mushaf and had prefered al-qiraat al-shazza to al-qiraat al-mutawatira and had given precedence to Arabic language and rethoric rather than naql and had gone beyond the limit in criticism of variant readings and had used variant readings for supporting their own views. In this article, after we gave those claims, we presented Mutazilah’s qiraat views with their terminology and theoretical approaches and practical usings in private of Zamakhshari. Finally, we will try to inquire those claims as taking into above-mentioned subjects and taking into consideration their back-grounds.

Detaylar

Sayı
Cilt: 3, Sayı: 3, Kış 2003
Geliş Tarihi
17.10.2003
Kabul Tarihi
15.10.2019
Yayın Tarihi
31.12.2003
Dergi Bölümü
Araştırma Makalesi
Bilim dal(lar)ı
Temel İslam Bilimleri,
Kur'an-ı Kerim Okuma ve Kıraat İlmi

Nasıl Atıf Yapılır

Dağ, Mehmet. “Mu’tezile Mezhebine Ehl-I Sünnet’in İsnâdı: ‘Kırâatlar, Tevkîfî Değil; İctihâdîdir’ -Zemahşerî Özelinde Bir İddianın Değerlendirilmesi--”. Marife 3/3. 31 Aralık 2003. 219-258. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3343385.
Özet Görüntüleme: 5
PDF İndirme: 8

Dosya İndirmeleri

Dosya indirme bilgisi bulunmuyor.