Araştırma Makalesi

Kur'an'da Eksiklik Olduğu İddiaları Bağlamında Bazı Surelerle İlgili Rivayetler Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme (Ahzâb, Muavvizeteyn, Kunut ve Nurayn Rivayetleri)

A Critique of the Narrations Related with Some Surahs in the Context of the Claims of the Omission in the Quran (Al-Ahzab, al-Muawwizatayn, al-Qunut, al-Noorayn Narrations)

Öz

In the Sunnite Hadith Compilations, there are same reports about the $urahs of Ahzab, Muawwizatayn and Qunut. These reports daim that the Surah of Ahzab was in fad as lengthy as the Surah of al-Baqara, that the Muawwizatayn did not exist in the Copy of ıbn Mas'ud, that the two Qunuts existed as the Chapters of the Qur'an in the eapy of Ubay. Relying on such reports, it has been claimed that there occured distortion on the Qur'an. However, none of these reports include the words of the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) who is the only authority in this issue. it is through the concensus of the Prophet's campanians which came down to us by tawatur that something is part of the Qur'an or not. All of the reports on this issue are exclusively al·khabar al·wahid. The problem is not more than the misunderstanding of same companions stemming from the fad that the Prophet recited the Muawwizatayn to shield his grandsons against the evil of Satan and that the Qunuts were recited as prayer though they were not in fad chapters of the Qur'an. The claim voiced by some Shi'ites that there existed a Surah called "Noorayn" in the Qur'an was alsa rejeded by the majority of the Shi'ites. As the text of a typical Shi'ite propaganda, this apocryphal Surah is not conSidered by Nöldeke and Schwally to be an authentic Qur'anic chapterı either.
In the Sunnite Hadith Compilations, there are same reports about the $urahs of Ahzab, Muawwizatayn and Qunut. These reports daim that the Surah of Ahzab was in fad as lengthy as the Surah of al-Baqara, that the Muawwizatayn did not exist in the Copy of ıbn Mas'ud, that the two Qunuts existed as the Chapters of the Qur'an in the eapy of Ubay. Relying on such reports, it has been claimed that there occured distortion on the Qur'an. However, none of these reports include the words of the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) who is the only authority in this issue. it is through the concensus of the Prophet's campanians which came down to us by tawatur that something is part of the Qur'an or not. All of the reports on this issue are exclusively al·khabar al·wahid. The problem is not more than the misunderstanding of same companions stemming from the fad that the Prophet recited the Muawwizatayn to shield his grandsons against the evil of Satan and that the Qunuts were recited as prayer though they were not in fad chapters of the Qur'an. The claim voiced by some Shi'ites that there existed a Surah called "Noorayn" in the Qur'an was alsa rejeded by the majority of the Shi'ites. As the text of a typical Shi'ite propaganda, this apocryphal Surah is not conSidered by Nöldeke and Schwally to be an authentic Qur'anic chapterı either.

Detaylar

Sayı
Cilt: 6, Sayı: 1, Bahar 2006
Geliş Tarihi
04.03.2006
Kabul Tarihi
19.08.2019
Yayın Tarihi
31.05.2006
Dergi Bölümü
Araştırma Makalesi
Bilim dal(lar)ı
Temel İslam Bilimleri,
Hadis

Nasıl Atıf Yapılır

Yavuz, Adil. “Kur’an’da Eksiklik Olduğu İddiaları Bağlamında Bazı Surelerle İlgili Rivayetler Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme (Ahzâb, Muavvizeteyn, Kunut Ve Nurayn Rivayetleri)”. Marife 6/1. 31 Mayıs 2006. 7-39. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3343709.
Özet Görüntüleme: 2
PDF İndirme: 5

Dosya İndirmeleri

Dosya indirme bilgisi bulunmuyor.
DergiPark İstatistikleri: