Araştırma Makalesi

Paylaşılan Praksis: Hayatı İnanç İnancı Hayatla Buluşturmak -Thomas Groome’ın Din Eğitimi Yaklaşımının Eleştirel Analizi-

Shared Praxis: Bringing Life to Faith and Faith to Life -A Critical Analysis of the Religious Educational Approach By Thomas Groome-

Öz

Bu makalede Thomas Groome tarafından geliştirilen paylaşılan praksis yaklaşımı analiz edilmektedir. Paylaşılan praksis, modern toplumda yaygınlık kazanan ve bir din eğitimi problemi olarak din ile hayat arasındaki görece mesafeli duruşa çözüm arayışı çerçevesinde din ile hayatı birbiriyle buluşturmayı hedefleyen bir din eğitimi yaklaşımıdır. "Hayattan inanca, inançtan hayata" cümlesi ile özetlenebilecek bu yaklaşımla, bir yandan günlük yaşamı inanç konularıyla buluşturmak, diğer yandan çoğu zaman günlük hayatın dışında veya uzağında tutulan kutsal metinleri bugün yaşanan hayatın içinde yeniden okuma hedeflenmektedir. Böylece bir yandan dinî muhteviyatla buluşturulan günümüz insanının hayatı inanç ilkeleri doğrultusunda gelişmeye ve değişmeye açık hâle getirilirken, diğer yandan inanç konuları günümüze taşınarak bugünün şartlarında yeniden anlaşılması ve anlamlandırılması hedeflenmektedir. Paylaşılan praksis yaklaşımının, din eğitiminde inanç ile hayatın birbirine yakınlaşmasında etkili olabilecek bir yaklaşım olduğu söylenebilir; ancak, uygulayıcısına göre bu yaklaşımla hayat ile inanç arasında dengeli bir etkileşimi hedeflemek mümkün iken, aynı zamanda hâlihazırdaki hayatın inanca veya inancın hâlihazırdaki hayata kolaylıkla kurban edildiği bir yaklaşım hâline gelmesi de mümkündür.
This paper analyzes the shared praxis approach to religious education of Thomas Groome. In seeking a solution to the distant stance, as a religious educational problem, between life and faith pervaded in modern societies, shared praxis is a religious educational approach aiming to bring life and faith together. By this approach outlined in the statement of "bringing life to faith and faith to life", it is aimed, on the one hand, to bring closer daily life and subject matters in faith, and to re-read the sacred texts, here and now, which are mostly kept away or out of the current life on the other hand. Thus, the modern man’s life which is brought together with faith, is exposed to develop and convert according to the principles of faith, and also, it is aimed to re-comprehension and re-interpretation of the subject matters in faith in the current conditions of the contemporary life. It can be said that shared praxis is an approach which has a potential to be effective in religious education in bringing life and faith closer. However, though it is possible to aim a balanced interaction between life and faith, it is also possible to become an approach by which the life is sacrificed for the faith, or the faith is sacrificed for the life at the hands of its practitioner.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Paylaşılan Praksis, Din Eğitimi, İnanç Eğitimi, Thomas Groome, Dinî Hayat
Shared Praxis, Religious Education, Education İn Faith, Thomas Groome, Religious Life

Kaynakça

  • Alves, Rubem A., A Theology of Human Hope, Corpus Books, New York 1969.
  • Baker, Michael, “Thomas H. Groome, A Modernist Heretic: Answer to Groome’s ‘Response’ to the Criticism of His Theology, by Eamonn Keane in A Generation Betrayed”, Part I. http://www.superflumina.org/PDF_files/Groome_1_modernist.pdf, ss. 1-17, (erişim tarihi: 09.07.2011).
  • Baker, Michael, “A Modernist Case Study-Thomas H Groome”, Part II of the Answer to Groome’s ‘Response’ to the Criticism of his Theology, by Eamonn Keane in A Generation Betrayed”, http://www.superflumina.org/PDF_files/Groome_II_modernist.pdf, ss. 1-11, (erişim tarihi: 09.07.2011).
  • Baker, Michael, “Questions for Catholic Parents in Parramatta”, http://www.superflumina.org/ PDF_files/Groome04_01.pdf, ss. 1-9, (erişim tarihi: 24 Temmuz 2011).
  • Bezzina, Michaeal – Gahan, Peter – McLenaghan, Helen – Wilson, Greg, “Shared Christian Praxis as a Basis for Religious Education Curriculum the Parramatta Experience”, (A paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Australian Association for Religious Education Southport October, 1996), http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED401266.pdf, ss. 1-20, (erişim tarihi: 15.08.2011).
  • Bezzina, Michael, “Does Groome’s Shared Praxis Provide a Sound Basis for Religious Education?” 1997, (Word In Life: Journal of Religious Education, 45 (3) 16-24), http://203.10.46.30/mre/cdrom/Does%20Groome%27s%20Shared%20Praxis%20Provide%20a%20Sound%20 Basis%20for%20RE.htm, (erişim tarihi: 14.07.2011).
  • Bilgin, Beyza, Eğitim Bilimi ve Din Eğitimi, Ankara Üniversitesi Basımevi, Ankara 1988.
  • Camara, Helder, Church and Colonialism: The Betrayal of the Third World, Dimension Book, Denville, N.J 1969.
  • Cebeci, Suat, Din Eğitimi Bilimi ve Türkiye’de Din Eğitimi, Akçağ Yayınları, Ankara 1996.
  • Freire, Pedagogies of the Oppressed, 3th Anniversary edition, trans. Myra Bergman Ramos with an Introduction by Donaldo Macedo, Continuum, New York 2005.
  • Gilligan, Carol, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development, Harvard University Press, Cambridge/London 2003.
  • Goldburg, Peta, “Developing Pedagogies for Inter-religious Teaching and Learning”, International Handbook of International Religious Education, ed. Kath Engebretson ve diğ., Springer, New York 2010, ss. 341-359.
  • Goldburg, Peta, “Teaching Religion in Australian Schools”, Numen 55 (2008), ss. 241-271.
  • Groome, Thomas H. & Horell, Harold Daly (eds.), Horizons and Hopes: The Future of Religious Education, Paulist Press, New Jersey 2003.
  • Groome, Thomas H., Will There Be Faith: A New Vision for Educating and Growing Disciples, Harper One: San Francisco 2011.
  • Groome, Thomas H., “Bring Life to Faith and Faith to Life for a Shared Christian Praxis Approach and Against a Detractor”, http://compassreview.org/spring06/4.html, (erişim tarihi 09.07.2011).
  • Groome, Thomas H., “A Shared Praxis Approach to Religious Education”, eds., Marian de Souza ve diğerleri, International Handbook of the Religious, Moral and Spiritual Dimensions in Education, Springer, the Netherlands 2008, ss. 763-777.
  • Groome, Thomas H., What makes us Catholic: Eight Gifts for Life, San Francisco: Harper San Francisco 2002.
  • Groome, Thomas H., Education for Life: A Spiritual Vision for Every Teacher and Parent, Thomas More, Allen, Texas 1998.
  • Groome, Thomas H., Christian Religious Education: Sharing Our Story and Vision, San Francisco, Jossey-Bass 1999.
  • Groome, Thomas H., Sharing Faith: A Comprehensive Approach to Religious Education and Pastoral Ministry: the Way of Shared Praxis, Harper Collins Publishers, New York 1991.
  • Groome, Thomas H., Language for a “Catholic” Church: A Program of Study, Sheed & Ward, Kansas City 1995.
  • Gutierrez, Gustavo, A Theology of Liberation, çev. Sister Caridad Inda ve John Eagleson, New York 1973.
  • Habermas, Jürgen, Knowledge and Human Interests, trans. Jeremy J. Shapiro, Beacon Press, Boston 1971.
  • Haidt, Jonathan, The Happiness Hypothesis: Finding Modern Truth in Ancient Wisdom, William Heineman, New York 2006.
  • Johnson, Stacey, “Beware of Thomas Groome or Anything Associated with Him”, New Oxford Review, ss. 31-36.
  • Karaca, Faruk, Dinî Gelişim Teorileri, Dem Yayınları, İstanbul 2007.
  • Kay, William K., “Philosophical Approaches to the Teaching of Religion in Schools”, International Handbook of the Religious, Moral, Spiritual Dimensions in Education, Springer, the Netherlands 2008, ss. 559-576.
  • Keane, Eamonn, A Generation Betrayed: Deconstructing Catholic Education in the English-Speaking World, Hatherleigh Press, New York 2002.
  • Kohlberg, Lawrence, “Stages of Moral Development as a Basis for Moral Education”, in Moral Development, Moral Education and Kohlberg: Basic Issues in Philosophy, Psychology, Religion, and Education, ed. Brenda Munsey, Religious Education Press, Birmingham-Alabama 1980, ss. 326-355.
  • Lamont, Corliss, The Philosophy of Humanism, 8. ed. Humanist Press, New York 1997.
  • Lovat, Terence J., What is This Thing Called Religious Education? Summary, Critique and a New Proposal, Social Science Press, Australia 1989.
  • Malone, Patricia “Changing Learning Paradigms in the Religious Education Classroom”, International Handbook of the Religious, Moral, Spiritual Dimensions in Education, Springer, the Netherlands 2008, ss. 731-747.
  • Nash, Ronald H. (ed.), On Liberation Theology, Mott Media, Michigan 1984.
  • Nuzzi, Ronald J., “Spirituality and Religious Education”, Hunt, Thomas C. (ed.), Handbook of Research on Catholic Education, Greenwood Press, Connecticut-London 2001, ss. 65-82.
  • Parladır, Selahattin, Din Eğitimi Bilimine Giriş, Anadolu Matbaacılık, İzmir 1996.
  • Raduntz, Helen T., “Shared Praxis Approach to Christian Religious Education: Why is it not so Critical?” In H. T. Raduntz (ed.), Potential and Opportunity: Critical Issues for Australian Catholic Education into the 21st Century, Adelaide: Auslib Press, 1995, ss. 191-203.
  • Ryan, Maurice, “Shared Christian Praxis: A Response to the Parramatta Diocese Experience”, http://203.10.46.30/ren/ryaarwsp.htm, (erişim tarihi: 12.01.2014).
  • Small, Robin, Marx and Education, Ashgate Publishing, Burlington 2005.
  • Tosun, Cemal, Din Eğitimi Bilimine Giriş, PegemA Yayıncılık, Ankara 2001.
  • Van Manen, Max, “Linking Ways of Knowing with Ways of Being Practical”, Curriculum Inquiry, 6 (3), 1976, ss. 205-228.
  • Woodbridge, Noel B., “Review of Thomas Groome, Sharing Faith: The Way of Shared Praxis”, Conspectus: The Journal of South African Theological Seminary, vol. 10, September 2010, s. 114-132.

Detaylar

Sayı
Cilt: 14, Sayı: 2, Yaz 2014
Geliş Tarihi
10.03.2014
Kabul Tarihi
25.08.2019
Yayın Tarihi
30.06.2014
Dergi Bölümü
Araştırma Makalesi
Bilim dal(lar)ı
Felsefe ve Din Bilimleri,
Din Eğitimi

Nasıl Atıf Yapılır

Gündüz, Turgay. “Paylaşılan Praksis: Hayatı İnanç İnancı Hayatla Buluşturmak -Thomas Groome’ın Din Eğitimi Yaklaşımının Eleştirel Analizi-”. Marife 14/2. 30 Haziran 2014. 85-105. https://doi.org/10.33420/marife.436784.
Özet Görüntüleme: 2
PDF İndirme: 1

Dosya İndirmeleri

Dosya indirme bilgisi bulunmuyor.
DergiPark İstatistikleri: